Instal the new for ios CrystalDiskInfo2/18/2024 ![]() More details in NVMe specification: Figure 93 Bit2 is what your drive reports I believe, that a degraded device reliability is serious. HWiNFO displays what the drive reports and I described the problem you see based on NVMe specification. ![]() I can't speak for the Lenovo utility, only they know which parameters it is checking and how well it supports NVMe. One needs to be familiar with the NVMe specification (public) first.ĬrystalDiskInfo reports values as SMART information, but this is just sort of faked - it creates virtual attributes (IDs) into which it translates the NVMe Log data. So the answer above and trying to figure out a respective SMART attribute for a NVMe drive is totally irrelevant. These drives report certain critical parameters straight, not like ATA/SATA. NVMe drives report SMART status using a different method, there are no SMART attributes, thresholds, etc. These drives work quite different than usual ATA/SATA drives. But I do not think you can claim warranty on it yet.įirst let's clarify that this is a NVMe drive. So keep an eye on this attribute and see if it changes again. This is not something to ignore, but does not mean your drive is dying or is dead. Errors such as uncorrectable ECC, CRC checksum failure, or LBA tag mismatch are included in this field." "Media and Data Integrity Errors: Contains the number of occurrences where the controller detected an unrecovered data integrity error. It appears from the author's comments he refers to attribute 0E - Media and Data Integrity Errors that has a HEX value 50, decimal 80.įrom (kingston's) literature this attribute is: (sorry I have no access to windows to check CrystalDisk's settings, but if you try you'll find it). So ask the HWiNFO author, which SMART attribute does this warning read and/or relates to.įinally in CrsytalDisk, there is a way to show SMART with decimal data rather than HEX. The only other option is for the drive to have reported a change in one of the smart attributes, maybe the "life" or "degradation" attribute from 100 to 99 or similar, and while all other apps still consider it good (as it should be considered) HWiNFO freaked out. Now smart reports no issues, Lenovo's utility reports no issues, only HWiNFO does and the author (in your link) does not state how this information is gathered.Īs far as I know, if Smart is all good, if i/o tests are all good, the drive is good. OEM drives are supported by the product manufacturer, not their own. The question that is still not answered is this: What Smart flag or other data does HWiNFO read to claim the drive has issues? Are this person's questions relevant and if so can you possibly when you get the time address them for me. I took the liberty (perhaps I should have asked first but my concern for the SSD drive drove me to ask about this in one of the Lenovo forums) and I linked this post there. How worried should I be in your opinion about the red flag warning when as I mentioned the Lenovo diagnostic tool showed nothing as well as apparently CrystalDiskInfo? Lenovo chat said my drive is not covered under warranty since their tool came back clean even though i provided them the info from HWINFO.Ģ. If you do no mind could you kindly answer two questions for me.ġ. Admittedly I will have to read up on the terms that you mention. Thanks so much for taking the time to walk me through this. SAMSUNG MZVPW256HEGL-000L7 - 238.47 GBs - Success Device Tests: Device Read TestSuccess Smart Wearout TestSuccess Device Write TestSuccess Results: FinalResultCode:W1GF6GJ9B-K2CVV6 after running a 45 minute HDD and SSD test. Please let me know where I need to drill down further if you need more info.ĬrystalDisk showed good (see pic.) As well as a 45 minute Lenovo Diagnostic Solutions scan: I am not exactly sure what you wanted to see. >I will need to see more SMART details that are not available in the sensors window, but in the main window in the Drive section. Also I recently updated HWINFO from whatever version I was running previously and if I am not mistaken the updated version coincided with the red FAIL message. And just to refresh the 90 or so times that I ran it before (daily) I never saw the red Fail message. I should have mentioned that I am using HWINFO ver. Thanks so much for taking a look at this.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |